ITV Technologies Inc. v. WIC Television Ltd.
The court exercised its discretion to award WIC costs for written arguments, counsel travel to examinations and trial, half of the non-expert witness Kirk's fee, costs of the motion, and ordered assessment at the high end of column IV of Tariff B; the court denied recovery of second counsel fees because those were retained in response to the opponent's apparent co-counsel and were avoidable.
- Citation
- 2005 FC 745
- Parties
- Plaintiff; Defendant by Counterclaim: ITV Technologies, Inc.; Defendant; Plaintiff by Counterclaim: WIC Television Ltd.; Plaintiff by Counterclaim: WIC TV Amalco Inc.; Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Global Communications Limited
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Expungement Claim and Counterclaim for Passing Off and Trademark Infringement / Post Trial Costs Assessment and Reasons for Order
- Outcome
- WIC's motion for costs partly granted and partly denied; second counsel fees denied; other requested costs granted and to be assessed at high end of column IV
- Legal Topics
- Expungement, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement, Costs Assessment, Witness Fees, Travel Expenses, Second Counsel
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ITV Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff; Defendant by Counterclaim
WIC Television Ltd.
Defendant; Plaintiff by Counterclaim
WIC TV Amalco Inc.
Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Global Communications Limited
Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Civil Expungement Claim and Counterclaim for Passing Off and Trademark Infringement / Post Trial Costs Assessment and Reasons for Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether WIC is entitled to recover fees for second counsel
- 2 Whether counsel fees for preparation and filing of written arguments should be awarded
- 3 Whether travel expenses for counsel to examinations for discovery and trial should be awarded
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to award WIC costs for written arguments, counsel travel to examinations and trial, half of the non-expert witness Kirk's fee, costs of the motion, and ordered assessment at the high end of column IV of Tariff B; the court denied recovery of second counsel fees because those were retained in response to the opponent's apparent co-counsel and were avoidable.
Court Disposition
WIC's motion for costs partly granted and partly denied; second counsel fees denied; other requested costs granted and to be assessed at high end of column IV
Orders
- Costs to both WIC and ITV for counsel fees for the preparation and filing of written arguments at trial pursuant to Tariff B table item 15
- Costs to WIC for travel by counsel to attend examinations for discovery and trial pursuant to Tariff B table item 24
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment