Naguib v. The Queen

Naguib v. The Queen

The Bill of Costs is taxed and allowed in full because the claimed counsel fees conformed to Tariff B and the disbursements were necessary and adequately documented, resulting in an award of $7,727.80 to the respondent.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 TCC 365
Parties
Appellant: Faidy Fouad Naguib; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
Court
Tax Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
7 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Taxation of Costs / Post Judgment Taxation Hearing
Outcome
Bill of Costs taxed and allowed in full; Respondent awarded costs of $7,727.80.
Legal Topics
Tax Court Rules, Tariff B, Disbursements, Certificate of Costs
Source Language
en
Tax Law Procedure Costs Law Tax Court Rules Tariff B Disbursements Certificate of Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Faidy Fouad Naguib

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Taxation of Costs / Post Judgment Taxation Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the claimed counsel fees comply with Tariff B of the Tax Court Rules
  2. 2 Whether the claimed disbursements were necessary and properly documented
  3. 3 Whether the Bill of Costs should be allowed in full

Ratio Decidendi

The Bill of Costs is taxed and allowed in full because the claimed counsel fees conformed to Tariff B and the disbursements were necessary and adequately documented, resulting in an award of $7,727.80 to the respondent.

Court Disposition

Bill of Costs taxed and allowed in full; Respondent awarded costs of $7,727.80.

Orders

  • I ALLOW THE SUM OF $7,727.80.
  • The bill of costs is taxed and $7,727.80 is allowed.