Casey v. Penty
The registrar accepted the solicitor's account of instructions, found the work was reasonably necessary and properly performed at a reasonable hourly rate, and therefore allowed the bills in full and awarded court order interest and costs.
- Citation
- 2000 BCSC 1733
- Parties
- Solicitor: Stephen Casey; Client: Richard Penty
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Review Under the Legal Profession Act / Registrar Review Hearing
- Outcome
- Bills allowed in full; solicitor entitled to court order interest and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Fee Dispute, Retainer, Scope of Retainer, Appeal, Costs, Court Order Interest
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Casey
Solicitor
Richard Penty
Client
Procedural Posture
Review Under the Legal Profession Act / Registrar Review Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the solicitor was validly retained and what the scope of instructions was
- 2 Whether the fees charged were reasonable and the work necessary
- 3 Whether a written retainer was required
Ratio Decidendi
The registrar accepted the solicitor's account of instructions, found the work was reasonably necessary and properly performed at a reasonable hourly rate, and therefore allowed the bills in full and awarded court order interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Bills allowed in full; solicitor entitled to court order interest and costs.
Orders
- Allow solicitor's bills in full
- Order payment of outstanding $6,986.93 plus court order interest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment