McGreevy v. Keeping
Registrar found there was no meeting of the minds on an hourly retainer, the solicitor failed to prove the client agreed to be billed hourly, and therefore the solicitor was not entitled to any fees; costs of the review awarded to the client under s.72 with solicitor liable to pay at Scale 3.
- Citation
- 2002 BCSC 167
- Parties
- Solicitor: John D. McGreevy; Client: Jeanette Keeping
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Bill Review Under Legal Profession Act / District Registrar Review Decision
- Outcome
- Solicitor's account disallowed; solicitor not entitled to any fee for the work; client awarded costs of the review; solicitor to pay costs at Scale 3.
- Legal Topics
- Fee Dispute, Retainer Agreement, Contingency Fee, Capacity to Instruct, Costs Allocation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John D. McGreevy
Solicitor
Jeanette Keeping
Client
Procedural Posture
Bill Review Under Legal Profession Act / District Registrar Review Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an hourly retainer existed between solicitor and client
- 2 Whether solicitor is entitled to recover fees in absence of a proven retainer
- 3 Whether solicitor complied with obligation to reduce retainer terms to writing given client's capacity concerns
Ratio Decidendi
Registrar found there was no meeting of the minds on an hourly retainer, the solicitor failed to prove the client agreed to be billed hourly, and therefore the solicitor was not entitled to any fees; costs of the review awarded to the client under s.72 with solicitor liable to pay at Scale 3.
Court Disposition
Solicitor's account disallowed; solicitor not entitled to any fee for the work; client awarded costs of the review; solicitor to pay costs at Scale 3.
Orders
- Solicitor is not entitled to any payment for the services in this matter and the account is disallowed
- Solicitor must pay the client's costs of the review
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment