Huard v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

Huard v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

The deputy judge's failure to give reasons as mandated by s.103(3) of the Employment Insurance Act rendered the decision reviewable and required reversal and remittal for re-hearing; the judicial review is allowed and costs are awarded to the applicant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 32
Parties
Plaintiff: Fernand Huard; Defendant: The Minister of National Revenue
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 January 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Tax Court of Canada (judicial Review) / Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)
Outcome
Judicial review allowed; deputy judge's decision reversed; matter remitted for re-hearing; costs awarded to applicant.
Legal Topics
Insurability of Employment, Reasons for Judgment, Judicial Review, Costs, Remand
Source Language
en
Employment Insurance Administrative Law Tax Law Insurability of Employment Reasons for Judgment Judicial Review Costs Remand

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fernand Huard

Plaintiff

The Minister of National Revenue

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Tax Court of Canada (judicial Review) / Judgment (federal Court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the deputy judge failed to give sufficient reasons as required by s.103(3) of the Employment Insurance Act
  2. 2 Whether the deputy judge's decision must be set aside and the matter remitted for re-hearing
  3. 3 Allocation of costs resulting from the defective decision

Ratio Decidendi

The deputy judge's failure to give reasons as mandated by s.103(3) of the Employment Insurance Act rendered the decision reviewable and required reversal and remittal for re-hearing; the judicial review is allowed and costs are awarded to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Judicial review allowed; deputy judge's decision reversed; matter remitted for re-hearing; costs awarded to applicant.

Orders

  • Judicial review allowed with costs
  • The deputy judge's decision is reversed