Jean c. Ressources Humaines

Jean c. Ressources Humaines

The appeal fails because the challenged reduction related to rental income which is income from property, not self‑employment income or cessation of a business within the meaning of s.14; accordingly the Minister properly refused the s.14 option and calculated the benefit rate on actual 2004 income in accordance...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2007 TCC 126
Parties
Appellant: Fernand Jean; Respondent: The Minister of Human Resources Development
Court
Tax Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
9 August 2007
Procedural Posture
Old Age Security Act Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed without costs
Legal Topics
Income Definition Under OAS, Distinction Between Income From Property and Income From Business, Estimation of Base Year Income, Application of S.14 Option/statement of Income
Source Language
en
Old Age Security Act Canada Pension Plan Pension and Social Benefits Law Administrative Law Income Definition Under OAS Distinction Between Income From Property and Income From Business Estimation of Base Year Income Application of S.14 Option/statement of Income

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fernand Jean

Appellant

The Minister of Human Resources Development

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Old Age Security Act Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether reduction of rental income qualifies as a ground to avail the s.14 option for the 2005 payment period
  2. 2 Whether the income at issue is income from property or income from carrying on a business
  3. 3 Whether the Minister correctly calculated benefit rate based on actual 2004 income rather than estimated 2005 income

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal fails because the challenged reduction related to rental income which is income from property, not self‑employment income or cessation of a business within the meaning of s.14; accordingly the Minister properly refused the s.14 option and calculated the benefit rate on actual 2004 income in accordance with ss.2 and 14 of the Act.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed without costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed without costs
  • Decision of the Minister dated November 21, 2005 confirmed