City of St. John v. MacDonald
The City, as operator of the ferry, was liable for the plaintiff's injuries caused by negligent mooring practices (letting down the guard chain and failing to secure the boat), and the plaintiff's conduct did not constitute such contributory negligence as to defeat recovery; the evidence of negligence was sufficient for the jury and their verdict was properly upheld.
- Citation
- (1886) 14 SCR 1
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of Saint John; Respondent/plaintiff: Roderic MacDonald
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 June 1886
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tort Appeal (personal Injury/transportation) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Supreme Court of New Brunswick
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Ferry Operator Liability, Mooring Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Carrier Duty to Passengers, Through Ticket as Fare
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of Saint John
Appellant/defendant
Roderic MacDonald
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort Appeal (personal Injury/transportation) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Supreme Court of New Brunswick
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a municipal corporation operating a ferry is liable for injuries caused by negligent acts of its officers
- 2 Whether acceptance of a through railway ticket coupon constituted payment/contract to carry and imposed carrier duties on the ferry operator
- 3 Whether the plaintiff's conduct constituted contributory negligence to bar recovery
Ratio Decidendi
The City, as operator of the ferry, was liable for the plaintiff's injuries caused by negligent mooring practices (letting down the guard chain and failing to secure the boat), and the plaintiff's conduct did not constitute such contributory negligence as to defeat recovery; the evidence of negligence was sufficient for the jury and their verdict was properly upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs in this court and in the court below.
- Verdict for plaintiff for $3000 upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment