Spun Rock Wools Ltd. v. Fiberglas Canada Ltd.
Majority held that claim 1 lacked the required inventive step/novelty over the prior art and common general knowledge and therefore the patent was invalid; appeal allowed and action dismissed.
- Citation
- [1943] SCR 547
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Spun Rock Wools Limited; Plaintiff: Fiberglas Canada Limited; Plaintiff: Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation; Defendant/respondent: The Custodian
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 October 1943
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Judgment of Exchequer Court of Canada (maclean J.)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Validity, Inventive Step, Infringement, Licensee Standing, Damages, Remedies (injunction, Account of Profits)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Spun Rock Wools Limited
Appellant/defendant
Fiberglas Canada Limited
Plaintiff
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
Plaintiff
The Custodian
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Judgment of Exchequer Court of Canada (maclean J.)
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of claim 1 (novelty and inventive step)
- 2 Whether respondents as licensees could maintain action and measure of damages
- 3 Appropriate remedies for infringement (injunction, damages or profits)
Ratio Decidendi
Majority held that claim 1 lacked the required inventive step/novelty over the prior art and common general knowledge and therefore the patent was invalid; appeal allowed and action dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; action dismissed
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Action dismissed with costs throughout
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment