Morgan v. Galbraith

Morgan v. Galbraith

The Court held that although the trial judge permissibly found the accident caused a persisting impairment and therefore a future loss of earning capacity, the judge failed to provide adequate factual findings to support the $700,000 quantification; accordingly the awards for past loss of income and future loss of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2013 BCCA 305
Parties
Respondent (plaintiff): Peter Rhys Morgan; Appellant (defendant): Kelly Galbraith
Court
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
27 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury (motor Vehicle) Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of British Columbia on Assessment of Damages; Remitted to Trial Judge for Reassessment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part: awards for past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity set aside and remitted to trial judge for reassessment; award for future cost of care upheld; cross-appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Future Loss of Earning Capacity, Mitigation, Past Wage Loss, Future Cost of Care, Non Pecuniary Damages, Expert Evidence
Source Language
english
Tort Law Personal Injury Damages Evidence Future Loss of Earning Capacity Mitigation Past Wage Loss Future Cost of Care +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Rhys Morgan

Respondent (plaintiff)

Kelly Galbraith

Appellant (defendant)

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury (motor Vehicle) Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of British Columbia on Assessment of Damages; Remitted to Trial Judge for Reassessment

  1. 1 Whether plaintiff proved a real and substantial possibility of future loss of earning capacity under Perren
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge provided adequate factual findings to quantify future loss of earning capacity
  3. 3 Proper quantification of past wage loss given plaintiff's change of career

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that although the trial judge permissibly found the accident caused a persisting impairment and therefore a future loss of earning capacity, the judge failed to provide adequate factual findings to support the $700,000 quantification; accordingly the awards for past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity were set aside and remitted for reassessment, while the future cost of care award was upheld and the cross-appeal against the mitigation reduction of non-pecuniary damages was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part: awards for past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity set aside and remitted to trial judge for reassessment; award for future cost of care upheld; cross-appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Set aside awards for past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity and remit those issues to the trial judge for reassessment in accordance with reasons
  • Uphold the trial judge's award for future cost of care in the amount awarded