Morgan v. Galbraith
The Court held that although the trial judge permissibly found the accident caused a persisting impairment and therefore a future loss of earning capacity, the judge failed to provide adequate factual findings to support the $700,000 quantification; accordingly the awards for past loss of income and future loss of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2013 BCCA 305
- Parties
- Respondent (plaintiff): Peter Rhys Morgan; Appellant (defendant): Kelly Galbraith
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury (motor Vehicle) Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of British Columbia on Assessment of Damages; Remitted to Trial Judge for Reassessment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part: awards for past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity set aside and remitted to trial judge for reassessment; award for future cost of care upheld; cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Future Loss of Earning Capacity, Mitigation, Past Wage Loss, Future Cost of Care, Non Pecuniary Damages, Expert Evidence
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Rhys Morgan
Respondent (plaintiff)
Kelly Galbraith
Appellant (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury (motor Vehicle) Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of British Columbia on Assessment of Damages; Remitted to Trial Judge for Reassessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff proved a real and substantial possibility of future loss of earning capacity under Perren
- 2 Whether the trial judge provided adequate factual findings to quantify future loss of earning capacity
- 3 Proper quantification of past wage loss given plaintiff's change of career
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that although the trial judge permissibly found the accident caused a persisting impairment and therefore a future loss of earning capacity, the judge failed to provide adequate factual findings to support the $700,000 quantification; accordingly the awards for past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity were set aside and remitted for reassessment, while the future cost of care award was upheld and the cross-appeal against the mitigation reduction of non-pecuniary damages was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part: awards for past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity set aside and remitted to trial judge for reassessment; award for future cost of care upheld; cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Set aside awards for past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity and remit those issues to the trial judge for reassessment in accordance with reasons
- Uphold the trial judge's award for future cost of care in the amount awarded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment