Corporation Steckmar, Re
The Federal Court has jurisdiction to summarily determine the payability of a term obligation incidental to enforcement of a registered Income Tax Act certificate under Rule 453 and may apply C.C.Q. art.1512 to fix the term and art.1627 to allow the creditor to exercise the debtor's rights; applying those principles the prothonotary did not err and the debt was found payable, so the appeal is dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- 2004 FC 1568
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Her Majesty the Queen; Judgment Debtor: La Corporation Steckmar / Steckmar Corporation; Garnishee: Steckmar National Realty and Investment Corporation
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Garnishment (income Tax Act Enforcement) / Appeal From Prothonotary Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; prothonotary's garnishment order upheld
- Legal Topics
- Garnishment, Summary Determination of Liability, Jurisdiction to Apply Provincial Law Incidentally, Term Obligations, Oblique Action, Enforcement of Tax Certificates
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Judgment Creditor
La Corporation Steckmar / Steckmar Corporation
Judgment Debtor
Steckmar National Realty and Investment Corporation
Garnishee
Procedural Posture
Garnishment (income Tax Act Enforcement) / Appeal From Prothonotary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prothonotary erred in granting a final order of garnishment against the garnishee
- 2 Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to determine payability/expiry of a term obligation governed by provincial law (C.C.Q.)
- 3 Whether Rule 453 allows summary determination of the garnishee's liability
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court has jurisdiction to summarily determine the payability of a term obligation incidental to enforcement of a registered Income Tax Act certificate under Rule 453 and may apply C.C.Q. art.1512 to fix the term and art.1627 to allow the creditor to exercise the debtor's rights; applying those principles the prothonotary did not err and the debt was found payable, so the appeal is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; prothonotary's garnishment order upheld
Orders
- Motion dismissed with costs
- Prothonotary's final garnishment order in favour of Her Majesty the Queen is confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment