R. v. Cadieux

R. v. Cadieux

Because the accused was not given his election on an indictable offence, the guilty plea and resulting verdict were invalid; the appeal is allowed and a new trial is ordered on the cultivation charge under s.7(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2019 ONCA 303
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Gaston Cadieux
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
23 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; guilty plea and verdict set aside; new trial ordered.
Legal Topics
Right to Election, Guilty Plea, Procedure, Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, Cultivation of Marijuana, New Trial
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Right to Election Guilty Plea Procedure Controlled Drugs and Substances Act Cultivation of Marijuana New Trial

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Gaston Cadieux

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the accused was given his election on an indictable offence
  2. 2 Whether the guilty plea was valid
  3. 3 Whether a new trial should be ordered

Ratio Decidendi

Because the accused was not given his election on an indictable offence, the guilty plea and resulting verdict were invalid; the appeal is allowed and a new trial is ordered on the cultivation charge under s.7(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; guilty plea and verdict set aside; new trial ordered.

Orders

  • Guilty plea and verdict set aside.
  • A new trial is ordered on the charge of cultivation of marijuana under s. 7(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c.19.