Sylvain v. Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency)

Sylvain v. Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency)

Because the appellant discontinued the appeal, the respondent was entitled to costs under Rule 402; the assessment officer reviewed the bill, allowed the fees and disbursements as reasonable except that item 26 was reduced to two units for an uncontested proceeding and item 27 was disallowed for lack of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2005 FCA 196
Parties
Appellant: GASTON J. SYLVAIN; Respondent: CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY; Mis En Cause: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal; Costs Assessment Following Discontinuance / Assessment of Costs Without Personal Appearance
Outcome
Bill of costs assessed and allowed in part in favour of respondent
Legal Topics
Discontinuance, Assessment of Costs, Rule 402 Federal Court Rules, Assessment Officer Decision
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Costs Federal Court Procedure Discontinuance Assessment of Costs Rule 402 Federal Court Rules Assessment Officer Decision

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

GASTON J. SYLVAIN

Appellant

CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY

Respondent

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Mis En Cause

Procedural Posture

Appeal; Costs Assessment Following Discontinuance / Assessment of Costs Without Personal Appearance

  1. 1 Whether respondent is entitled to costs following appellant's discontinuance
  2. 2 Whether claimed fees and disbursements are reasonable and should be allowed
  3. 3 Whether specific items in the bill (items 26 and 27) should be allowed or reduced

Ratio Decidendi

Because the appellant discontinued the appeal, the respondent was entitled to costs under Rule 402; the assessment officer reviewed the bill, allowed the fees and disbursements as reasonable except that item 26 was reduced to two units for an uncontested proceeding and item 27 was disallowed for lack of substantiation, and assessed the bill at $3,859.42 with a certificate of assessment to be issued.

Court Disposition

Bill of costs assessed and allowed in part in favour of respondent

Orders

  • Bill of costs allowed in the amount of $3,859.42
  • Item 26 reduced to two units