2020 RLLR 113
Claimants were found credible and established on a balance of probabilities that, as women opposing compulsory hijab, they face a serious possibility of persecution with an objective basis in country documentation, state protection is unavailable and no internal flight alternative exists, therefore they meet the definition of Convention refugees.
- Citation
- 2020 RLLR 113
- Court
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim (refugee Protection Division) / Decision / Determination Following Hearing
- Outcome
- Claimants accepted as Convention refugees; claims allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Gender Based Violence, Membership of a Particular Social Group, Compulsory Hijab, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Child Claimant
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (refugee Protection Division) / Decision / Determination Following Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants meet the definition of a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether persecution arises from membership in a particular social group (women opposing compulsory hijab)
- 3 Whether there is an objective basis for fear of persecution
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants were found credible and established on a balance of probabilities that, as women opposing compulsory hijab, they face a serious possibility of persecution with an objective basis in country documentation, state protection is unavailable and no internal flight alternative exists, therefore they meet the definition of Convention refugees.
Court Disposition
Claimants accepted as Convention refugees; claims allowed.
Orders
- Claimants granted refugee protection (claims accepted).
- Written decision to be provided to counsel; counsel to assist with translation to claimants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment