United States of America v. Su Go

United States of America v. Su Go

Because counsel for the applicant fairly conceded that the judicial review application could not succeed given the Court's conclusion on the related appeal, the application must be dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 ONCA 883
Parties
Respondent: The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of The United States of America; Applicant: Gerald Su Go a.k.a. Geraldo Su Go a.k.a. Gerald Sugo a.k.a. Gerald Su
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
14 December 2009
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Dismissal on Concession Following Appellate Conclusion
Outcome
Application dismissed.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Dismissal on Concession, Procedural Posture
Source Language
en
Criminal Judicial Review Appeals Dismissal on Concession Procedural Posture

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of The United States of America

Respondent

Gerald Su Go a.k.a. Geraldo Su Go a.k.a. Gerald Sugo a.k.a. Gerald Su

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Dismissal on Concession Following Appellate Conclusion

  1. 1 Whether the application for judicial review can succeed in light of the court's conclusion on the related appeal
  2. 2 Whether dismissal is appropriate where counsel concedes non‑viability

Ratio Decidendi

Because counsel for the applicant fairly conceded that the judicial review application could not succeed given the Court's conclusion on the related appeal, the application must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed.

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed.