Hamonic v. Canada (Attorney General)
The applicant failed to establish that the Umpire made any errors of law or fact; therefore the application for judicial review is dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2002 FCA 146
- Parties
- Applicant: Gerard Hamonic; Respondent: Attorney General of Canada
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Decision on Application for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Administrative Decision, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerard Hamonic
Applicant
Attorney General of Canada
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Decision on Application for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Umpire committed errors of law or fact warranting judicial review
- 2 Whether grounds for intervention by the Court were established
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish that the Umpire made any errors of law or fact; therefore the application for judicial review is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed.
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Hamonic v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-04-23 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 146 File numbers A-515-00 Decision Content Date: 20020423 Docket: A-515-00 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 146 Present: ISAAC J.A. SEXTON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: GERARD HAMONIC Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on April 23, 2002. Order delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia, on April 23, 2002. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: MALONE J.A. Date: 20020423 Docket: A-515-00 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 146 Present: ISAAC J.A. SEXTON J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: GERARD HAMONIC Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER MALONE J.A. [1] We are all of the view that the applicant has not satisfied us that the Umpire made any errors in law or fact that would warrant the intervention of this Court. [2] We would dismiss the application for judicial review. (Sgd.) "B. Malone" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-515-00 STYLE OF CAUSE: Gerard Hamonic v. AGC PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, BC DATE OF HEARING: April 23, 2002 REASONS FOR ORDER : MALONE J.A. DATED: April 23, 2002 APPEARANCES: Gerard Hamonic FOR THE APPLICANT Edward Burnet FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Gerard Hamonic FOR THE APPLICANT Kamloops, BC Morris Rosenberg FOR THE RESPONDENT Deputy Attorney General of Canada