Tremblay v. Canada

Tremblay v. Canada

Respondent's fees and disbursements are allowed except item 26 is reduced to 2 units because there was no opposition and item 27 is disallowed because Tariff B contains no provision for preparation of a notice of appearance; disbursements supported by affidavit are allowed, yielding a total award of $1,218.56.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 315
Parties
Appellant: Gilles Tremblay; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada; Respondent: Revenue Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
6 August 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Assessment of Costs
Outcome
Bill of costs allowed in part for the respondent
Legal Topics
Costs Assessment, Service of Process, Tariff Items, Disbursements
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Tax Law Costs Costs Assessment Service of Process Tariff Items Disbursements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gilles Tremblay

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada

Respondent

Revenue Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Assessment of Costs

  1. 1 whether the respondent's claimed fees should be allowed in full
  2. 2 whether item 26 should be reduced
  3. 3 whether item 27 is recoverable under Tariff B

Ratio Decidendi

Respondent's fees and disbursements are allowed except item 26 is reduced to 2 units because there was no opposition and item 27 is disallowed because Tariff B contains no provision for preparation of a notice of appearance; disbursements supported by affidavit are allowed, yielding a total award of $1,218.56.

Court Disposition

Bill of costs allowed in part for the respondent

Orders

  • Bill of costs assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,218.56
  • Disbursements allowed in the amount of $155.22