Leigh v. Belfast Mini-Mills

Leigh v. Belfast Mini-Mills

The court refused plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment on the pleadings and on evidence and dismissed the abuse of process and conversion-to-application motions because the defence disclosed a legitimate basis and material facts were in dispute; delay and use of FOIPOP material did not amount to abuse; the action should remain as an action to preserve jury rights and permit fuller discovery; the court ordered resumption of discovery and compelled plaintiffs to answer specified lines of questioning and to produce specified documents (EHS calls, RCMP files for 2004–2006, certain medical/naturopath/Dr. Boucher records) subject to relevancy and privilege rules; costs reserved.

Citation
2011 NSSC 300
Parties
Plaintiff: Gillian Leigh; Plaintiff: Wanda Cummings; Plaintiff: Toltec Holdings Incorporated carrying on business as Mabou Ridge Centre for Holistic Living; Defendant: Belfast Mini-Mills Ltd.; Defendant: International Spinners Ltd.
Court
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
20 July 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Litigation Contract and Negligence / Interlocutory Motions (summary Judgment, Abuse of Process, Discovery/disclosure Disputes)
Outcome
Plaintiffs' motions dismissed in full; discovery and production orders granted in part in favour of defendants; action to proceed as action (not converted) and defence not struck.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Abuse of Process, Discovery and Undertakings, Relevancy and Privilege, Conversion of Action to Application, Production of FOIPOP Materials, Right to Jury Trial
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gillian Leigh

Plaintiff

Wanda Cummings

Plaintiff

Toltec Holdings Incorporated carrying on business as Mabou Ridge Centre for Holistic Living

Plaintiff

Belfast Mini-Mills Ltd.

Defendant

International Spinners Ltd.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Litigation Contract and Negligence / Interlocutory Motions (summary Judgment, Abuse of Process, Discovery/disclosure Disputes)

  1. 1 Whether the defendants' statement of defence should be struck or summary judgment entered for the plaintiffs
  2. 2 Whether the defendants' conduct constituted an abuse of process (including allegations of delay and misuse of FOIPOP material)
  3. 3 Whether the action should be converted to an application

Ratio Decidendi

The court refused plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment on the pleadings and on evidence and dismissed the abuse of process and conversion-to-application motions because the defence disclosed a legitimate basis and material facts were in dispute; delay and use of FOIPOP material did not amount to abuse; the action should remain as an action to preserve jury rights and permit fuller discovery; the court ordered resumption of discovery and compelled plaintiffs to answer specified lines of questioning and to produce specified documents (EHS calls, RCMP files for 2004–2006, certain medical/naturopath/Dr. Boucher records) subject to relevancy and privilege rules; costs reserved.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' motions dismissed in full; discovery and production orders granted in part in favour of defendants; action to proceed as action (not converted) and defence not struck.

Orders

  • Plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment, to strike the defence, to find abuse of process, and to convert the action to an application are dismissed
  • Plaintiffs Gillian Leigh and Wanda Cummings must attend for resumption of discovery and answer questions including: whether Leigh provided counselling to Cummings; visits by RCMP or emergency health services to plaintiffs' home; alcohol consumption of either plaintiff; knowledge of Cummings being ejected or banned...