Lafreniere v. Lafreniere

Lafreniere v. Lafreniere

The issues raised principally related to an earlier order of Dunbar J. from which no appeal was taken; because the appeal amounted to a collateral attack on that unappealed order and there was nothing properly before the Court on those points, the appeal was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
C40682
Parties
Appellant: Gina K. Lafreniere; Respondent: P. Douglas Lafreniere
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
4 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Family / Appeal to Court of Appeal for Ontario; Heard and Endorsed March 3, 2004; Appeal From Orders of Superior Court (byers J. and Earlier Dunbar J. Matters)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Pension Valuation, Disclosure of Employee Benefits, Settlement Conference, Collateral Attack on Prior Order, Appealability
Source Language
en
Family Law Civil Procedure Pension Valuation Disclosure of Employee Benefits Settlement Conference Collateral Attack on Prior Order Appealability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gina K. Lafreniere

Appellant

P. Douglas Lafreniere

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Appeal to Court of Appeal for Ontario; Heard and Endorsed March 3, 2004; Appeal From Orders of Superior Court (byers J. and Earlier Dunbar J. Matters)

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal should decide pension valuation issues
  2. 2 Whether disclosure of the respondent's employee benefits should be ordered
  3. 3 Whether the matter should be remitted for a further settlement conference

Ratio Decidendi

The issues raised principally related to an earlier order of Dunbar J. from which no appeal was taken; because the appeal amounted to a collateral attack on that unappealed order and there was nothing properly before the Court on those points, the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.