R v Carson
The trial judge accepted the complainant's version, rejected critical defence witnesses and the accused's account as not credible, found the touching was by the hand (not accidental knuckle contact), concluded it was done for a sexual purpose in the employer-employee context, and therefore the Crown proved sexual assault beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Citation
- 2020 NSPC 58
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: Glen Carson
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial Decision (conviction)
- Outcome
- Guilty of sexual assault (s.271 Criminal Code)
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Assault, Mens Rea, Consent, Credibility Assessment, Publication Ban
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Glen Carson
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial Decision (conviction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Nature of the touching (hand vs knuckle)
- 2 Whether touching was for a sexual purpose
- 3 Whether touching was accidental / lacked mens rea
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge accepted the complainant's version, rejected critical defence witnesses and the accused's account as not credible, found the touching was by the hand (not accidental knuckle contact), concluded it was done for a sexual purpose in the employer-employee context, and therefore the Crown proved sexual assault beyond a reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
Guilty of sexual assault (s.271 Criminal Code)
Orders
- Guilty verdict entered against Glen Carson for sexual assault contrary to s.271 Criminal Code
- Publication ban pursuant to s.486.4 Criminal Code (restriction on identifying victim/witness)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment