Pass Herald Ltd. v. Google LLC
The Court approved the Amended LFA as being in the interests of justice, subject to limiting pre-approval to an OBC Return not exceeding 10% of the total claim proceeds and preserving the Court’s discretion to reassess any scenario in which OBC’s return would exceed 10%; the unredacted LFAs are to remain confidential and under seal; approval is conditional on delivery of the prescribed undertaking by OBC/Omni Bridgeway and no costs were awarded.
- Citation
- 2024 FC 305
- Parties
- Plaintiff (representative): Pass Herald Ltd.; Defendant: Google LLC; Defendant: Google Ireland Limited; Defendant: Google Canada Corporation; Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc.; Defendant: Facebook Ireland Limited; Defendant: Facebook Canada Ltd.; Litigation Funder; Third Party: Omni Bridgeway (Fund 5) Canada Investments Ltd. (OBC)
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Proposed Class Proceeding / Motion to Approve Amended Litigation Funding Agreement and Confidentiality Order (pre Certification Funding Approval)
- Outcome
- Amended LFA approved in part; confidentiality order granted; undertaking required; no costs awarded
- Legal Topics
- Competition Act S45 S46 S47 S52, Litigation Funding Approval, Champerty and Maintenance, Class Counsel Fees, Access to Justice, Court Discretion on Funding Terms
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pass Herald Ltd.
Plaintiff (representative)
Google LLC
Defendant
Google Ireland Limited
Defendant
Google Canada Corporation
Defendant
Meta Platforms Inc.
Defendant
Facebook Ireland Limited
Defendant
Facebook Canada Ltd.
Defendant
Omni Bridgeway (Fund 5) Canada Investments Ltd. (OBC)
Litigation Funder; Third Party
Procedural Posture
Proposed Class Proceeding / Motion to Approve Amended Litigation Funding Agreement and Confidentiality Order (pre Certification Funding Approval)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the amended litigation funding agreement (Amended LFA) should be approved as being in the interests of justice
- 2 Whether the redacted provisions of the Amended LFA should remain confidential and sealed
- 3 Whether the Amended LFA is champertous
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the Amended LFA as being in the interests of justice, subject to limiting pre-approval to an OBC Return not exceeding 10% of the total claim proceeds and preserving the Court’s discretion to reassess any scenario in which OBC’s return would exceed 10%; the unredacted LFAs are to remain confidential and under seal; approval is conditional on delivery of the prescribed undertaking by OBC/Omni Bridgeway and no costs were awarded.
Court Disposition
Amended LFA approved in part; confidentiality order granted; undertaking required; no costs awarded
Orders
- Approve the Amended LFA insofar as the return to OBC, over and above reimbursement of the amount funded, does not exceed 10% of the total claim proceeds; preserve Court discretion to address any scenario where OBC’s return would exceed 10%
- Unredacted versions of the initial LFA and the Amended LFA shall remain confidential and under seal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment