Boyko v. Purdue

Boyko v. Purdue

Because the child was in the respondent's care during September 2000, the court varied the existing order to relieve the respondent of the obligation to pay support for that month.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2000 BCSC 1807
Parties
Petitioner: Tricia Rhea Boyko; Respondent: Gordon Antony Purdue; Child Advocate: Child (Kaine)
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
14 December 2000
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Support / Further Supplementary Reasons for Judgment
Outcome
Order varied to relieve respondent of support obligation for September 2000.
Legal Topics
Variation of Support Order, Care Arrangements, Retroactive Adjustment
Source Language
english
Family Law Child Support Court Procedure Variation of Support Order Care Arrangements Retroactive Adjustment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tricia Rhea Boyko

Petitioner

Gordon Antony Purdue

Respondent

Child (Kaine)

Child Advocate

Procedural Posture

Family Law Child Support / Further Supplementary Reasons for Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the support order should be varied for September 2000
  2. 2 Whether respondent should be relieved of support payments because the child was in his care during that period

Ratio Decidendi

Because the child was in the respondent's care during September 2000, the court varied the existing order to relieve the respondent of the obligation to pay support for that month.

Court Disposition

Order varied to relieve respondent of support obligation for September 2000.

Orders

  • Respondent relieved of the requirement to pay child support for Kaine for the month of September 2000.