Nightingale v. Union Colliery Co. of British Columbia

Nightingale v. Union Colliery Co. of British Columbia

Where the deceased is a gratuitous passenger, the carrier is not liable for injury or death unless the carrier's conduct amounts to gross negligence; omission to maintain a bridge, standing alone, did not meet the threshold of gross negligence in this case.

Citation
(1904) 35 SCR 65
Parties
Appellant / Plaintiff (administratrix): Margaret Nightingale; Respondent / Defendant: The Union Colliery Company of British Columbia
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
30 May 1904
Procedural Posture
Tort — Negligence (railway Carrier Liability) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Supreme Court of British Columbia in Banco
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in banco affirmed.
Legal Topics
Gratuitous Passenger, Gross Negligence, Duty to Maintain Infrastructure, Liability of Carrier for Death, Statutory Compensation (families Compensation Act)
Source Language
English
Torts Negligence Carrier/railway Law Wrongful Death Gratuitous Passenger Gross Negligence Duty to Maintain Infrastructure Liability of Carrier for Death +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margaret Nightingale

Appellant / Plaintiff (administratrix)

The Union Colliery Company of British Columbia

Respondent / Defendant

Procedural Posture

Tort — Negligence (railway Carrier Liability) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Supreme Court of British Columbia in Banco

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a carrier is liable to a gratuitous passenger absent evidence of gross negligence
  2. 2 Whether failure to maintain a bridge constitutes gross negligence sufficient to impose common‑law liability for death
  3. 3 Interaction between common‑law liability and statutory remedies under the Families Compensation Act

Ratio Decidendi

Where the deceased is a gratuitous passenger, the carrier is not liable for injury or death unless the carrier's conduct amounts to gross negligence; omission to maintain a bridge, standing alone, did not meet the threshold of gross negligence in this case.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in banco affirmed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Judgment entered for defendants with costs; judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia affirmed