Green v. George
- Citation
- (1907) 42 SCR 219
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Decision
- 13 November 1907
- Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada; Motion to Quash Appeal; Appeal Heard and Dismissed
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Decision
- 13 November 1907
- Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada; Motion to Quash Appeal; Appeal Heard and Dismissed
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on the respondent's motion to quash, thereby refusing to overturn the lower courts' handling of the application to set aside the default judgment; the appeal was not entertained and was dismissed with costs.
Court disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
02
Material facts
Parties
Green
Appellant Counsel: Charles MillarGeorge
Respondent Counsel: C.A. MossAmounts and remedies
- Costs Awarded: 0
03
Procedural history
Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada; Motion to Quash Appeal; Appeal Heard and Dismissed
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the defendant (Green) was entitled to have a default judgment entered against him set aside and vacated
- 02
Whether the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada should be quashed for lack of proper jurisdiction or procedural grounds
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant (Green) sought to set aside a judgment entered by default for non-appearance (judgment dated 6 October 1890) and to be permitted to come in and defend the action; an issue was directed by the Master in Chambers on Green's application dated 17 March 1906.
- Respondent
- The respondent (George) moved to quash the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, contending the appeal should not be entertained (procedural/jurisdictional objection) and the order below should stand.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Supreme Court of Canada decision in Green v. George (1907) 42 S.C.R. 219
An appellate court may dismiss an appeal on a motion to quash where the appeal is improperly brought or the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it.
- 02
Ontario practice as applied in lower courts and referenced in Green v. George (1907) 42 S.C.R. 219
A court may consider applications to set aside default judgments and refer issues to a Master in Chambers as part of remedial civil procedure.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on the respondent's motion to quash, thereby refusing to overturn the lower courts' handling of the application to set aside the default judgment; the appeal was not entertained and was dismissed with costs.
Court disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court of Canada · 13 November 1907
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court of Canada
Judgment· 13 November 1907
Green v. George Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1907-11-13 Report (1907) 42 SCR 219 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Maclennan, James; Duff, Lyman Poore On appeal from Ontario Subjects Appeal Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Green v. George, (1907) 42 S.C.R. 219 Date: 1907-11-13 Green and George 1907: November 13. Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Maclennan and Duff JJ. Appeal—Jurisdiction—Dismissing appeal. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1], affirming the judgment of a Divisional Court[2], which had sustained an order made by Britton J., to set aside a judgment entered by default for non-appearance and allow the defendant to come in and defend the action. In delivering the judgment appealed from, Osler J., at page 580, states that an issue was directed by the Master in Chambers on an application made by the defendant (Green) on 17th March, 1906, to set aside a judgment entered against him on 6th October, 1890, and that the question to be determined on the appeal was whether or not the defendant, the plaintiff in the issue, was entitled to have the judgment set aside and vacated. On motion, on behalf of the respondent, to quash the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing counsel the appeal was dismissed with costs. Appeal dismissed with costs. Charles Millar for the appellant. C.A. Moss for the respondent. [1] 14 Ont. L.R. 578. [2] 13 Ont. L.R. 189.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.