Canada Judgment

Supreme Court of Canada

Green v. George

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on the respondent's motion to quash, thereby refusing to overturn the lower courts' handling of the application to set aside the default judgment; the appeal was not entertained and was dismissed with costs.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Green

Appellant Counsel: Charles Millar

George

Respondent Counsel: C.A. Moss

Amounts and remedies

  • Costs Awarded: 0

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada; Motion to Quash Appeal; Appeal Heard and Dismissed

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant (Green) sought to set aside a judgment entered by default for non-appearance (judgment dated 6 October 1890) and to be permitted to come in and defend the action; an issue was directed by the Master in Chambers on Green's application dated 17 March 1906.
Respondent
The respondent (George) moved to quash the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, contending the appeal should not be entertained (procedural/jurisdictional objection) and the order below should stand.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Supreme Court of Canada decision in Green v. George (1907) 42 S.C.R. 219

    An appellate court may dismiss an appeal on a motion to quash where the appeal is improperly brought or the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it.

  2. 02

    Ontario practice as applied in lower courts and referenced in Green v. George (1907) 42 S.C.R. 219

    A court may consider applications to set aside default judgments and refer issues to a Master in Chambers as part of remedial civil procedure.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on the respondent's motion to quash, thereby refusing to overturn the lower courts' handling of the application to set aside the default judgment; the appeal was not entertained and was dismissed with costs.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

  • Appeal dismissed with costs

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court of Canada · 13 November 1907

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court of Canada

Judgment· 13 November 1907

(1907) 42 SCR 219

Green v. George Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1907-11-13 Report (1907) 42 SCR 219 Judges Fitzpatrick, Charles; Davies, Louis Henry; Idington, John; Maclennan, James; Duff, Lyman Poore On appeal from Ontario Subjects Appeal Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Green v. George, (1907) 42 S.C.R. 219 Date: 1907-11-13 Green and George 1907: November 13. Present: Sir Charles Fitzpatrick C.J. and Davies, Idington, Maclennan and Duff JJ. Appeal—Jurisdiction—Dismissing appeal. APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario[1], affirming the judgment of a Divisional Court[2], which had sustained an order made by Britton J., to set aside a judgment entered by default for non-appearance and allow the defendant to come in and defend the action. In delivering the judgment appealed from, Osler J., at page 580, states that an issue was directed by the Master in Chambers on an application made by the defendant (Green) on 17th March, 1906, to set aside a judgment entered against him on 6th October, 1890, and that the question to be determined on the appeal was whether or not the defendant, the plaintiff in the issue, was entitled to have the judgment set aside and vacated. On motion, on behalf of the respondent, to quash the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, after hearing counsel the appeal was dismissed with costs. Appeal dismissed with costs. Charles Millar for the appellant. C.A. Moss for the respondent. [1] 14 Ont. L.R. 578. [2] 13 Ont. L.R. 189.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Green v. George (1907) 42 S.C.R. 219

Case cited

Court of Appeal for Ontario decision 14 Ont. L.R. 578

Case cited

Divisional Court decision 13 Ont. L.R. 189

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.