Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal
The contemporaneous oral agreement that purported to discharge the guarantor conflicted with the express terms of the written continuing guarantee and was therefore inadmissible; the written guarantee governed and the appeal must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [1969] SCR 515
- Parties
- Appellant Guarantor: Andrew Hawrish; Respondent Plaintiff: Bank of Montreal
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 1969
- Procedural Posture
- Contract Guarantee/collection / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan; Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee, Continuing Guarantee, Parol Evidence Rule, Collateral Contract, Discharge of Guarantor
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Hawrish
Appellant Guarantor
Bank of Montreal
Respondent Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Contract Guarantee/collection / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan; Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether contemporaneous oral agreement can vary or discharge a written continuing guarantee
- 2 Whether parol evidence of a collateral oral agreement is admissible when it contradicts the written instrument
- 3 Whether the guarantee operated as an escrow or was immediately effective
Ratio Decidendi
The contemporaneous oral agreement that purported to discharge the guarantor conflicted with the express terms of the written continuing guarantee and was therefore inadmissible; the written guarantee governed and the appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment