R. v. F.L.
The accused failed to discharge the civil burden to prove his guilty plea was invalid; his evidence was inconsistent and not credible, the record (including counsel's affidavit and interpreter presence) showed he was informed and voluntary in pleading guilty, and therefore the application to withdraw the plea was dismissed.
- Citation
- 2011 NSPC 8
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: F. L.
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Assault / Application to Withdraw Guilty Plea (post Plea)
- Outcome
- Application to withdraw guilty plea dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Guilty Plea, Withdrawal of Plea, Sexual Assault, Interpretation/language Barrier, Pre Sentence Report, Sentencing Submissions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
F. L.
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Application to Withdraw Guilty Plea (post Plea)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the guilty plea was voluntary, unequivocal and informed
- 2 Whether language/communication issues or failure to view complainant's videotaped statement rendered the plea invalid
- 3 Whether the accused understood the consequences of his plea including impact on contact with his child
Ratio Decidendi
The accused failed to discharge the civil burden to prove his guilty plea was invalid; his evidence was inconsistent and not credible, the record (including counsel's affidavit and interpreter presence) showed he was informed and voluntary in pleading guilty, and therefore the application to withdraw the plea was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application to withdraw guilty plea dismissed
Orders
- Application to withdraw guilty plea dismissed
- Reasons for dismissal released February 24, 2011
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment