R v Scheiring
The applicant did not discharge the burden on a balance of probabilities to show the plea was uninformed; the record shows she was represented by competent counsel who explained the options and obtained her instructions, she personally affirmed the plea during the s.606 inquiry, and objectively the plea was voluntary, unequivocal and informed, therefore the application to withdraw the guilty plea is denied.
- Citation
- 2022 NSPC 7
- Parties
- Crown: R; Applicant/accused: Natalie Scheiring
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Assault / Application to Withdraw Guilty Plea (post Plea, Pre Sentencing)
- Outcome
- Application to withdraw guilty plea denied.
- Legal Topics
- Guilty Plea Withdrawal, Informed Plea, S.606 Plea Confirmation, Conditional Discharge, Plea Bargaining, Credibility Assessment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Crown
Natalie Scheiring
Applicant/accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Assault / Application to Withdraw Guilty Plea (post Plea, Pre Sentencing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plea was uninformed on the balance of probabilities
- 2 Whether defence counsel adequately informed the accused before plea
- 3 Whether the plea was voluntary and unequivocal
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not discharge the burden on a balance of probabilities to show the plea was uninformed; the record shows she was represented by competent counsel who explained the options and obtained her instructions, she personally affirmed the plea during the s.606 inquiry, and objectively the plea was voluntary, unequivocal and informed, therefore the application to withdraw the guilty plea is denied.
Court Disposition
Application to withdraw guilty plea denied.
Orders
- Application to withdraw guilty plea denied.
- Matter to proceed with or without a presentence report as counsel elects.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment