Giles v. Boissonneault
Although the purchaser proved extensive rot and that silence amounted to a false representation, the vendor did not know or recklessly disregard the falsity; absence of requisite fraudulent intent (moral turpitude) together with the "as is, where is" sale requires dismissal of the fraudulent misrepresentation claim.
- Citation
- 2014 NSSM 12
- Parties
- Claimant: Richard Alan Giles; Defendant: Guy Oscar Boissonneault
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court Sale of Real Property / Decision
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed without costs.
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Caveat Emptor, Latent Defects, As Is, Where Is, Damages
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Alan Giles
Claimant
Guy Oscar Boissonneault
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Sale of Real Property / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is liable for fraudulent misrepresentation arising from non‑disclosure of rot in mobile home support beams
- 2 Whether silence can amount to a fraudulent representation in sale of land
- 3 Effect of an "as is, where is" clause on liability for alleged fraudulent misrepresentation
Ratio Decidendi
Although the purchaser proved extensive rot and that silence amounted to a false representation, the vendor did not know or recklessly disregard the falsity; absence of requisite fraudulent intent (moral turpitude) together with the "as is, where is" sale requires dismissal of the fraudulent misrepresentation claim.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed without costs.
Orders
- Claim dismissed without costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment