Baradaran v. Canada (National Revenue)

Baradaran v. Canada (National Revenue)

The motion was denied because the Court had previously decided the identical issue; the Court will not consider a motion that has already been decided, and it accordingly refused the applicants' request while granting an extension of time to file the Appeal Book to March 20, 2009.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 FCA 34
Parties
Appellant: Hamid Baradaran; Appellant: Shiva Khodabakhsh; Respondent: The Minister of National Revenue
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
2 March 2009
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Motion for Removal of Transcript; Appeal Book Filing (pre Appeal Procedural Motion)
Outcome
Motion denied; time for filing Appeal Book extended to March 20, 2009.
Legal Topics
Appeal Book Contents, Access to Court Records, Cost of Transcript, Extension of Time
Source Language
en
Tax Law Civil Procedure Administrative Law Appeal Book Contents Access to Court Records Cost of Transcript Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hamid Baradaran

Appellant

Shiva Khodabakhsh

Appellant

The Minister of National Revenue

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal / Motion for Removal of Transcript; Appeal Book Filing (pre Appeal Procedural Motion)

  1. 1 Whether the appellants can obtain removal of the Tax Court transcript from the Appeal Book due to inability to afford it
  2. 2 Whether the Court will reconsider or reopen an issue already decided by the Court (res judicata/finality)
  3. 3 Whether and to what extent the Court will extend the time for filing the Appeal Book

Ratio Decidendi

The motion was denied because the Court had previously decided the identical issue; the Court will not consider a motion that has already been decided, and it accordingly refused the applicants' request while granting an extension of time to file the Appeal Book to March 20, 2009.

Court Disposition

Motion denied; time for filing Appeal Book extended to March 20, 2009.

Orders

  • Motion to remove the transcript from the contents of the Appeal Book denied
  • Time for filing the Appeal Book is extended to Friday, March 20, 2009