Saraffian v. Canada (Human Resources and Skills Development)

Saraffian v. Canada (Human Resources and Skills Development)

The Review Tribunal's factual finding that the appellant did not reside in Canada prior to July 1, 1977 was reasonable and not a reviewable error; the Federal Court properly declined to intervene and the Federal Court of Appeal will dismiss the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2013 FCA 232
Parties
Appellant: Hanna Saraffian; Respondent: Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Administrative Decision (old Age Security Pension) / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal From Federal Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; Federal Court judgment affirmed
Legal Topics
Residency Requirement, Old Age Security Act, Standard of Review, Review Tribunal Factual Findings
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Social Security Law Pension Law Residency Requirement Old Age Security Act Standard of Review Review Tribunal Factual Findings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hanna Saraffian

Appellant

Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review of Administrative Decision (old Age Security Pension) / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal From Federal Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Review Tribunal erred in finding the appellant did not reside in Canada prior to July 1, 1977
  2. 2 Whether the Federal Court judge erred in refusing to intervene in the Review Tribunal's decision

Ratio Decidendi

The Review Tribunal's factual finding that the appellant did not reside in Canada prior to July 1, 1977 was reasonable and not a reviewable error; the Federal Court properly declined to intervene and the Federal Court of Appeal will dismiss the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; Federal Court judgment affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs awarded to the respondent