Harrison v. British Columbia
- Citation
- 2013 BCCA 465
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Decision
- 23 October 2013
- Posture
- Appeal and Application to Vary a Chambers Order / Application to Review Chambers Decision and to Reopen Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Decision
- 23 October 2013
- Posture
- Appeal and Application to Vary a Chambers Order / Application to Review Chambers Decision and to Reopen Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The chambers judge correctly refused to reopen the appeal because the application had no possibility of success; there was no merit to justify varying the chambers order, so the application to vary is dismissed and the chambers decision is upheld.
Court disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Application to vary the chambers order dismissed
- Chambers decision refusing to reopen the appeal upheld
- Costs awarded to the respondent
- Appellant's signature dispensed with on the form of order
02
Material facts
Parties
Robert Glen Harrison
Respondent (plaintiff) Counsel: E.L. RossHer Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia
Appellant (defendant) Counsel: In PersonJoan Bischoff
Appellant (defendant) Counsel: In Person03
Procedural history
Posture
Appeal and Application to Vary a Chambers Order / Application to Review Chambers Decision and to Reopen Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the chambers judge erred in refusing to reopen the appeal
- 02
Whether the application to vary the chambers order should be granted
- 03
Whether costs should be awarded to the respondent
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant sought review of the chambers judge's refusal to reopen the appeal and an order compelling the appeal to be reopened.
- Respondent
- Respondent submitted the application had no possibility of success, lacked merit, and that the chambers judge's decision should be upheld and the application dismissed with costs.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court of Appeal for British Columbia
Finality of appellate decisions and a high threshold to reopen appeals
- 02
Court of Appeal for British Columbia
A chambers judge's discretionary decision will not be disturbed absent demonstrable error or clear merit
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The chambers judge correctly refused to reopen the appeal because the application had no possibility of success; there was no merit to justify varying the chambers order, so the application to vary is dismissed and the chambers decision is upheld.
Obiter and limits
- Appellant's signature dispensed with on the form of order.
- Decision rendered unanimously by the panel
Court disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
- Application to vary the chambers order dismissed
- Chambers decision refusing to reopen the appeal upheld
- Costs awarded to the respondent
- Appellant's signature dispensed with on the form of order
Source and reliance status
British Columbia Court of Appeal · 23 October 2013
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Judgment· 23 October 2013
2013 BCCA 465 Harrison v. British Columbia
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Harrison v. British Columbia, 2013 BCCA 465 Date: 20131023 Docket: CA037057 Between: Robert Glen Harrison Respondent (Plaintiff) And Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia and Joan Bischoff Appellants (Defendants) Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Lowry The Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel The Honourable Madam Justice A. MacKenzie Application to vary order of a Justice of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, August 23, 2013 (Harrison v. British Columbia, CA037057) Oral Reasons for Judgment Appellant appearing In Person: Counsel for the Respondent: E.L. Ross Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, British Columbia October 23, 2013 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, British Columbia October 23, 2013 Summary: Application to vary an order made in chambers dismissing the application for an order compelling the reopening of the appeal. Dismissed. [1] LOWRY J.A.: The applicant's action was dismissed by a division of this Court upon hearing the appeal. He made application to the division to reopen the hearing of the appeal and that was denied. He then applied in chambers for the same order and the chambers judge said, "Concerning the application to reopen, it is difficult for me to see how such an application could have any possibility of success." [2] Clearly, the application could not have success. The applicant now seeks to have us review the chambers judge's decision and we are all of the view that there is no merit in his application for review, and it is to be dismissed with costs. [3] The appellant's signature is dispensed with on the form of order. [4] FRANKEL J.A.: I agree. [5] A. MACKENZIE J.A.: I agree. "The Honourable Mr. Justice Lowry"
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.