R. v. Guled
Leave to appeal is denied because the appellant failed to raise a question of law of general importance and failed to demonstrate clear legal error in the summary conviction appeal court's reasons; the Court of Appeal agreed that the lower court considered the arguments and found them without merit.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2014 ONCA 716
- Parties
- Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Hashi Jama Guled
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Application (denied)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal denied
- Legal Topics
- Summary Conviction, Leave to Appeal, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Hashi Jama Guled
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Application (denied)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the summary conviction appeal court committed a clear legal error in upholding the conviction
- 3 Whether a question of law of general importance was raised
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is denied because the appellant failed to raise a question of law of general importance and failed to demonstrate clear legal error in the summary conviction appeal court's reasons; the Court of Appeal agreed that the lower court considered the arguments and found them without merit.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal denied
Orders
- Leave to appeal denied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Guled Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2014-10-21 Neutral citation 2014 ONCA 716 Docket numbers C57405 Judges Simmons, Janet M.; Rouleau, Paul S.; Tulloch, Michael H. Subject Criminal Decision Content COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: R. v. Guled, 2014 ONCA 716 DATE: 20141020 DOCKET: C57405 Simmons, Rouleau and Tulloch JJ.A. BETWEEN Her Majesty the Queen Respondent and Hashi Jama Guled Appellant H. Michael Rosenberg, for the appellant Kevin Rawluk, for the respondent Heard: October 16, 2014 On appeal from the decision of the Summary Convictions Appeal Court dated June 3, 2013 by Justice Ian A. MacDonnell of the Superior Court of Justice, dismissing the appeal from the conviction entered on January 13, 2012 by Justice John Ritchie of the Ontario Court of Justice. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] Leave to appeal is denied. No question of law of general importance has been raised. Moreover, the appellant has failed to demonstrate clear legal error in the summary conviction appeal court judge’s reasons. The summary conviction appeal court judge considered the arguments raised and found them to be without merit. We agree.