Ming Ng v. Canada
A careful review of the record showed no factual or legal errors by Hershfield J.; therefore the appellate court declined to intervene and dismissed the appeal with costs.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2005 FCA 356
- Parties
- Appellant: Henry Ting Ming Ng; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Standard of Review, Dismissal With Costs, Intervention by Appellate Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Henry Ting Ming Ng
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Hershfield J. made legal or factual errors
- 2 Whether the appellate court should intervene and allow the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
A careful review of the record showed no factual or legal errors by Hershfield J.; therefore the appellate court declined to intervene and dismissed the appeal with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Ming Ng v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-10-27 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 356 File numbers A-541-04 Decision Content Date: 20051027 Docket: A-541-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 356 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. EVANS J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: HENRY TING MING NG Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on October 27, 2005. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on October 27, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: MALONE J.A. Date: 20051027 Docket: A-541-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 356 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. EVANS J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: HENRY TING MING NG Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on October 27, 2005) MALONE J.A. [1] A careful review of the record in this appeal reveals that Hershfield J. made no factual or legal errors and properly evaluated all relevant evidence and considerations, when on September 8, 2004 he ordered that the appeal be dismissed with costs. [2] There is no basis upon which this Court should intervene. Accordingly, the appeal should be dismissed with costs. (Sgd.) "B. Malone" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-541-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: Henry Ting Ming Ng v. Her Majesty the Queen PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, B.C. DATE OF HEARING: October 27, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: DESJARDINS, EVANS , MALONE JJ.A. REASONS READ FROM THE BENCH BY: MALONE J.A. APPEARANCES: Mr. Henry Ting Ming Ng FOR THE APPELLANT (on his own behalf) Mr. Tom Torrie FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: FOR THE APPELLANT John Sims, Q.C. FOR THE RESPONDENT Deputy Attorney General for Canada