Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Butt
The Court dismissed the Crown's appeal because the Board's factual findings were supported by the record and are binding under s.26 of the Utility and Review Board Act, the Board correctly applied the law to those facts, no error of law was shown, and therefore the Board's award (including compensation, interest and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 1996 NSCA 222
- Parties
- Appellant: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Nova Scotia, represented by the Attorney General of Nova Scotia; Respondents: Margaret Butt and Gene Butt
- Court
- Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Administrative Tribunal (utility and Review Board) / Judgment of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Board order affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation, Injurious Affection, Business Losses, Interest, Costs (solicitor Client), Binding Findings of Fact, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Nova Scotia, represented by the Attorney General of Nova Scotia
Appellant
Margaret Butt and Gene Butt
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Tribunal (utility and Review Board) / Judgment of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Board erred in law in awarding compensation and related items
- 2 Whether the Board's factual findings were supported by the evidence
- 3 Whether s.26 of the Utility and Review Board Act renders the Board's factual findings binding and conclusive
Ratio Decidendi
The Court dismissed the Crown's appeal because the Board's factual findings were supported by the record and are binding under s.26 of the Utility and Review Board Act, the Board correctly applied the law to those facts, no error of law was shown, and therefore the Board's award (including compensation, interest and costs) was affirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Board order affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Order of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board dated April 23, 1996 affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Butt Court Court of Appeal Date 1996-11-20 Citation 1996 NSCA 222 Docket CA 128143 Judge/Registrar/Adjudicator Clarke, Lorne O. (Honourable Chief Justice); Hart, Gordon L.S. (Honourable Justice); Matthews, Kenneth M., (Honourable Justice) Document Type Decision Decision Content C.A. No. 128143 NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Cite as: Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Butt, 1996 NSCA 222 Clarke, C.J.N.S.; Hart and Matthews, JJ.A. BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, ) John W. Traves IN THE RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE ) for the Appellant OF NOVA SCOTIA, REPRESENTED ) BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ) NOVA SCOTIA ) Appellant ) - and - ) ) David B. Ritcey, Q.C. ) Harold F. Jackson, Q.C. ) for the Respondent MARGARET and GENE BUTT ) ) Respondents ) Appeal Heard: ) November 20, 1996 ) ) ) Judgment Delivered: ) November 20, 1996 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE COURT: The appeal is dismissed, with costs, from a decision and order of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board, per oral reasons for judgment of Clarke, C.J.N.S.; Hart and Matthews, JJ.A. concurring. C.A. No. 128143 NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, ) IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE ) OF NOVA SCOTIA, REPRESENTED BY ) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF N.S. ) ) Appellant ) - and - ) REASONS FOR ) JUDGMENT BY MARGARET and GENE BUTT ) ) CLARKE, C.J.N.S. ) (Orally) Respondents ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The reasons for judgment of the Court were delivered orally by: CLARKE, C.J.N.S.: The respondents, Margaret Butt and Gene Butt, owned land at Glendyer in the county of Inverness, some of which was expropriated by the Crown for highway purposes on October 11, 1983. The reconstruction of the highway including a portion of Ram Hill occurred in the Spring and Summer of 1984. Pursuant to the Expropriation Act, then S.N.S. 1973, c. 7, the respondents applied to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board to determine the compensation to which they contended they were entitled. The Board, in its decision of April 23, 1996 and by its Order of the same date, determined the respondents are entitled to compensation for the value of the land, injurious affection, business losses, damages, interest on the principal sum at 6% from July 1, 1985, legal costs on a solicitor-client basis and certain other appraisal costs. The Board ordered compensation in the gross amount of $189,747.46 (Expropriation Act, s. 47(1)). The Crown appeals from the decision and Order of the Board. Section 30(1) of the Utility and Review Board Act, S.N.S. 1992, c. 11, provides: 30 (1) An appeal lies to the Appeal Division of the Supreme Court from an order of the Board upon any question as to its jurisdiction or upon any question of law, upon filing with the Court a notice of appeal within thirty days after the issuance of the order. (The Appeal Division of the Supreme Court is now the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal). - 2 - The jurisdiction of the Board is not an issue in this appeal. The Board made findings of fact in favour of the respondents on practically every significant issue. After a diligent examination of the extensive record, we are persuaded there is sufficient evidence to support each of them. By virtue of s. 26 of the Utility and Review Board Act such findings are "binding and conclusive". The section states: 26 The finding or determination of the Board upon a question of fact within its jurisdiction is binding and conclusive. In our opinion, the Board applied the law to the facts as found. As a result, no error in law was made by the Board and no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. We affirm the Order of the Board dated April 23, 1996. We award costs to the respondents to be taxed on a solicitor-client basis. C.J.N.S. Concurred in: Hart, J.A. Matthews, J.A.