R. v. Jordan

R. v. Jordan

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal did not have significance to the administration of justice beyond the facts of the case and had no merit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2012 ONCA 364
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Applicant/appellant: Sean Jordan
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal (from Summary Conviction)
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Summary Conviction, Appealability, Administration of Justice, Merit
Source Language
en
Criminal Leave to Appeal Summary Conviction Appealability Administration of Justice Merit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Sean Jordan

Applicant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal (from Summary Conviction)

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the proposed appeal has significance to the administration of justice
  3. 3 Whether the proposed appeal has merit

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal did not have significance to the administration of justice beyond the facts of the case and had no merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed.