R. v. Black

R. v. Black Court Court of Appeal Date 2002-05-23 Citation 2002 NSCA 72 Docket CAC 179671 Judge/Registrar/Adjudicator Flinn, Edward J. (Honourable Justice) Document Type Decision Decision Content Date: 20020523 Docket: CAC 179671 NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL [Cite as: R. v. Black 2002 NSCA 72] BETWEEN: FREDERICK WILLIAM LOGAN BLACK Applicant - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, her servants the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Respondents DECISION Counsel: Applicant in person Dana Giovannetti, Q.C. for the respondents Application Heard: May 16, 2002 Decision Delivered: May 23, 2002 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE FLINN, IN CHAMBERS FLINN, J.A. (In Chambers): [1] The applicant, Mr. Black is presently before the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia charged with three counts of fraud contrary to s. 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code. He elected trial before a Supreme Court judge without a jury. The matter is being heard by Justice Murphy of the Supreme Court. [2] In his affidavit in support of the application, Mr. Black deposes to the dismissal by Justice Murphy of various pre-trial Charter applications which Mr. Black had made. The details of those applications are not before me. Mr. Black advised me that he subsequently made an application before Justice Murphy requesting an order that Justice Murphy recuse himself from presiding over the trial on the basis of alleged bias. Mr. Black advised me that Justice Murphy refused that application. The material in support of that application and the decision of Justice Murphy are not before me. [3] In his application before me, Mr. Black seeks an order as follows: (a) . . . 1) disqualifying the trial justice John D. Murphy, or in the alternative 2) allowing the accused to re-elect trial by judge and jury; (b) If the trial is to proceed on the dismissal of an application to quash the ‘information’ and ‘summons’, an Order granting a change of venue to the province of residence of the accused, notwithstanding the CC, s. 599, and in reliance on Ss. 6, 7, 15 & 24 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; (c) An Order granting fixed costs to the Applicant; (d) Such further and other relief as the Applicant advises and as this Honourable Court seems just in the circumstances. [4] After hearing Mr. Black and counsel for the Crown I summarily dismissed Mr. Black’s application. [5] Mr. Black has filed a notice of appeal from my dismissal of his application and has asked me to provide reasons in support of my judgment dismissing his application. [6] In my view the record is clear as to why I dismissed Mr. Black’s application. However, since Mr. Black is a self-represented litigant I will provide these supplementary reasons which can be read along with the record of the hearing. [7] In essence, I dismissed Mr. Black’s application because in my opinion, and, although given the opportunity, Mr. Black could not provide any authority to the contrary: (a) as a judge of the Court of Appeal, I have no jurisdiction to grant the order which Mr. Black requests; and (b) the Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to grant the order which Mr. Black requests. [8] The limited jurisdiction of a judge of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, sitting in chambers, is reviewed in some length by Justice Hallett in Future Inns Canada Inc. v. Nova Scotia (Labour Relations Board) (1996), 154 N.S.R. (2d) 358. That limited jurisdiction does not include jurisdiction to grant the relief requested by Mr. Black. Further I know of no authority, nor could Mr. Black direct me to any authority, which contemplates an application for an order of prohibition originating in the Court of Appeal. The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal is a statutory court and derives its appellate jurisdiction by statute. It is not a court of original jurisdiction. The law is clear that Mr. Black cannot launch an interlocutory appeal of a matter involving an indictable offence. That is, in effect, what he is attempting to do by this application. [9] Mr. Black’s application is therefore dismissed. Flinn, J.A.