R. v. Frost
The appeal is moot because the court's disposition in the related matter (C49201) removed any practical controversy, rendering further consideration unnecessary.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2010 ONCA 495
- Parties
- Appellant: Her Majesty The Queen; Respondent: James Kenneth Frost
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Appeal From Sentence (superior Court of Justice)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as moot
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Mootness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty The Queen
Appellant
James Kenneth Frost
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence (superior Court of Justice)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal remains live or is moot in light of a related disposition (C49201)
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is moot because the court's disposition in the related matter (C49201) removed any practical controversy, rendering further consideration unnecessary.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as moot
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Frost Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2010-07-09 Neutral citation 2010 ONCA 495 Docket numbers C48526 Judges Moldaver, Michael James; Simmons, Janet M.; Juriansz, Russell G. Subject Criminal Decision Content CITATION: R. v. Frost, 2010 ONCA 495 DATE: 20100709 DOCKET: C48526 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Moldaver, Simmons and Juriansz JJ.A. BETWEEN: Her Majesty The Queen Appellant and James Kenneth Frost Respondent Kevin Wilson, for the appellant Philip Campbell, for the respondent Heard and endorsed: July 7, 2010 On appeal from the sentence imposed by Justice Nola Garton of the Superior Court of Justice dated February 20, 2008. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] In view of our disposition in C49201, this appeal has become moot.