R. v. J.R.S.

R. v. J.R.S.

The trial judge’s factual findings that the sexual assault was life altering established serious bodily harm as a matter of law (per R. v. McCraw); therefore a deferred custody order under s.42(5) YCJA was unavailable and the original sentence was illegal. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the deferred custody...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2019 ONCA 852
Parties
Appellant: Her Majesty the Queen; Respondent: J.R.S.
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
30 October 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Under the Youth Criminal Justice Act / Appeal From Sentence (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; original deferred custody order and probation order set aside and substituted sentence imposed.
Legal Topics
Youth Criminal Justice Act, Deferred Custody Order, Serious Bodily Harm, Sentence Legality, Probation, Custody and Supervision, Weapons Prohibition, Publication Ban
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Youth Justice Sentencing Youth Criminal Justice Act Deferred Custody Order Serious Bodily Harm Sentence Legality Probation +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Appellant

J.R.S.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Under the Youth Criminal Justice Act / Appeal From Sentence (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the sexual assault caused serious bodily harm for purposes of sentencing under the Youth Criminal Justice Act
  2. 2 Whether a deferred custody order under s.42(5) of the YCJA was legally available
  3. 3 Whether the original sentence was illegal and required substitution by the appellate court

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge’s factual findings that the sexual assault was life altering established serious bodily harm as a matter of law (per R. v. McCraw); therefore a deferred custody order under s.42(5) YCJA was unavailable and the original sentence was illegal. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the deferred custody and prior probation order, and imposed a substituted custody and supervision order (six months nine days with two months community supervision), a one year probation order, and the mandatory two year weapons prohibition, giving appropriate credit.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; original deferred custody order and probation order set aside and substituted sentence imposed.

Orders

  • Deferred custody order and prior probation order set aside.
  • Impose a custody and supervision order of six months and nine days, two months of which shall be community supervision.