R. v. Mitchell
The Court held the trial judge was not functus officio but, in any event, the requirements of s.561(7) were effectively waived by the appellant through competent counsel; accordingly the re‑election was valid, the conviction stood, and the appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- 2020 ONCA 187
- Parties
- Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Hugh Mitchell
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal From Conviction / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence to the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Re‑election Under S.561(7) of the Criminal Code, Waiver by Counsel, Functus Officio and Trial Judge Jurisdiction, Preliminary Inquiry Procedure, Sentencing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Hugh Mitchell
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal From Conviction / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence to the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the re‑election to be tried summarily under s.561(7) was valid given the statutory wording was not read to the accused
- 2 Whether the trial judge was functus officio and therefore unable to re‑open proceedings to entertain a further re‑election
- 3 Whether counsel validly waived the accused's right under s.561(7)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held the trial judge was not functus officio but, in any event, the requirements of s.561(7) were effectively waived by the appellant through competent counsel; accordingly the re‑election was valid, the conviction stood, and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Conviction and sentence affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment