R. v. MacLaurin
There was no basis on the record to conclude the Board's decision was unreasonable; therefore the appeal was dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- C39105
- Parties
- Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Ian MacLaurin
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Appeal From Disposition of the Ontario Review Board (august 7, 2002)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Reasonableness Standard, Ontario Review Board
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Ian MacLaurin
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Disposition of the Ontario Review Board (august 7, 2002)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Ontario Review Board's decision was unreasonable
- 2 Whether appellate intervention was warranted
Ratio Decidendi
There was no basis on the record to conclude the Board's decision was unreasonable; therefore the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. MacLaurin Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2003-05-07 Docket numbers C39105 Judges Weiler, Karen Merle Magnuson; MacPherson, James C.; Cronk, Eleanore Ann Subject Criminal Decision Content DATE: 20030507 DOCKET: C39105 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RE: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Respondent) - and - IAN MacLAURIN (Appellant) BEFORE: WEILER, MacPHERSON and CRONK JJ.A. COUNSEL: Michael Davies,for the appellant Leslie Paine, for the respondent HEARD: May 7, 2003 On appeal from the disposition of the Ontario Review Board dated August 7, 2002. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] On this record there is no basis for concluding that the Board's decision was unreasonable. [2] Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.