International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers Union, Local 97, et al. v. Canadian Ironworkers Union No. 1
Where representatives of affiliated unions, acting through a building trades council, used illegal means (strike and threats) to obtain a subcontractors' clause that would damage a rival union, and where evidence showed those representatives acted with authority or apparent authority for Local 97, Local 97 is liable for the tortious acts; authority may be inferred from conduct and shared objectives even without formal agreement.
- Citation
- [1972] SCR 295
- Parties
- Appellants (defendants): International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers Union, Local 97, et al.; Respondent (plaintiff): Canadian Ironworkers Union No. 1
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 October 1971
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Law Appeal (tort Arising From Industrial Relations) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for British Columbia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal judgment finding liability against Local 97 and ordering a new trial limited to damages is affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Illegal Strike and Picketing, Conspiracy/illegal Means to Obtain Subcontractors' Clause, Implied Agency/authority, Damages, Building Trades Council Arrangements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers Union, Local 97, et al.
Appellants (defendants)
Canadian Ironworkers Union No. 1
Respondent (plaintiff)
Procedural Posture
Labour Law Appeal (tort Arising From Industrial Relations) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for British Columbia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Local 97 can be held liable for torts committed by affiliated unions and council agents
- 2 Whether using illegal means to secure a lawful objective gives rise to tortious liability when damage results
- 3 Whether authority or agency can be inferred from conduct absent formal agreement
Ratio Decidendi
Where representatives of affiliated unions, acting through a building trades council, used illegal means (strike and threats) to obtain a subcontractors' clause that would damage a rival union, and where evidence showed those representatives acted with authority or apparent authority for Local 97, Local 97 is liable for the tortious acts; authority may be inferred from conduct and shared objectives even without formal agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal judgment finding liability against Local 97 and ordering a new trial limited to damages is affirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- New trial limited to assessment of damages ordered (order of the Court of Appeal affirmed)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment