Beairsto v. Harvey
Imputation of income under s.19 was denied for the period of the respondent's relationship with a partner who had a profoundly disabled child because his caregiving responsibilities fell within s.19(1)(a); the court treated respondent's income as $12,000/year for November-December 2003 for interim purposes and ordered the table amount of $173/month commencing January 1, 2004; retroactive imputation beyond that was refused; the respondent was ordered to pay one half of the net orthodontic cost for Sabrina (after insurance and tax credits) at $37/month commencing January 1, 2004 with jurisdiction reserved to determine the precise amount if parties disagree; the application to delete the...
- Citation
- 2005 NSSC 161
- Parties
- Applicant (custodial Parent): Brigitte Suzanne Marie Beairsto; Respondent (non Custodial Parent): James Matthew Wilson Harvey; Co Applicant/step Parent: Craig Beairsto
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Custody and Maintenance Variation and Enforcement / Trial Decision on Multiple Variation, Enforcement and Leave Applications
- Outcome
- Application partially granted and partially dismissed: imputation of income denied except interim treatment for Nov-Dec 2003; table support of $173/month ordered from Jan 1, 2004; s.7 orthodontic contribution ordered; mobility clause retained with modification; leave for joint custody denied; access schedule...
- Legal Topics
- Imputation of Income Under Child Support Guidelines, Retroactive Child Support, Special Expenses S.7, Step Parent Joint Custody Leave, Mobility Clause, Access Scheduling, Costs for Failure to Disclose Tax Returns
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brigitte Suzanne Marie Beairsto
Applicant (custodial Parent)
James Matthew Wilson Harvey
Respondent (non Custodial Parent)
Craig Beairsto
Co Applicant/step Parent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Custody and Maintenance Variation and Enforcement / Trial Decision on Multiple Variation, Enforcement and Leave Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether income should be imputed to the respondent under s.19 of the Child Maintenance Guidelines
- 2 Whether retrospective child maintenance should be ordered to April 2000
- 3 Whether s.7 special expenses (orthodontics) should be shared and in what proportion
Ratio Decidendi
Imputation of income under s.19 was denied for the period of the respondent's relationship with a partner who had a profoundly disabled child because his caregiving responsibilities fell within s.19(1)(a); the court treated respondent's income as $12,000/year for November-December 2003 for interim purposes and ordered the table amount of $173/month commencing January 1, 2004; retroactive imputation beyond that was refused; the respondent was ordered to pay one half of the net orthodontic cost for Sabrina (after insurance and tax credits) at $37/month commencing January 1, 2004 with jurisdiction reserved to determine the precise amount if parties disagree; the application to delete the...
Court Disposition
Application partially granted and partially dismissed: imputation of income denied except interim treatment for Nov-Dec 2003; table support of $173/month ordered from Jan 1, 2004; s.7 orthodontic contribution ordered; mobility clause retained with modification; leave for joint custody denied; access schedule...
Orders
- Respondent's income treated as $12,000/year for Nov-Dec 2003 and table amount of $173/month ordered payable commencing January 1, 2004
- No imputation of income under s.19 beyond the period where caregiving responsibilities justified limited employment; imputation denied generally
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment