Calf v. British Columbia Securities Commission
Application for indigent status was refused because the Court must defer to the Commission's factual findings and, on review of the Commission's reasons, the likelihood of success on appeal was extremely low.
- Citation
- 2000 BCCA 64
- Parties
- Plaintiff (appellant): Maurice John Calf; Defendant (respondent): British Columbia Securities Commission
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Administrative Tribunal Decision / Application for Indigent Status in Connection With Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for indigent status refused
- Legal Topics
- Indigent Status, Standard of Review, Deference to Administrative Findings, Procedural Fairness, Likelihood of Success
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maurice John Calf
Plaintiff (appellant)
British Columbia Securities Commission
Defendant (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Tribunal Decision / Application for Indigent Status in Connection With Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indigent status should be granted for an appeal from the British Columbia Securities Commission
- 2 Whether the Commission erred in its factual findings or in handling witness appearance and documentary evidence
- 3 What standard of review and degree of deference is owed to the Commission's factual findings
Ratio Decidendi
Application for indigent status was refused because the Court must defer to the Commission's factual findings and, on review of the Commission's reasons, the likelihood of success on appeal was extremely low.
Court Disposition
Application for indigent status refused
Orders
- Application for indigent status refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment