H.L. Weiss Forwarding Ltd. v. Omnus

H.L. Weiss Forwarding Ltd. v. Omnus

Majority allowed the appeal in part and awarded an additional $10,000 in punitive damages because the defendants knowingly induced breaches of employment, implemented a pre-existing plan to appropriate the plaintiff's business and goodwill, and successfully put the plaintiff out of business, conduct warranting...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1976] 1 SCR 776
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: H.L. Weiss Forwarding Limited; Defendant/respondent: Peter Omnus; Defendant/respondent: Hermann Ludwig Allgemeine Land-Und Seetransportgesellschaft; Defendant/respondent: Jurgen Eisen; Defendant/respondent: Hermann Ludwig (Canada) Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
26 June 1975
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Tort and Contract (conspiracy and Inducing Breach of Employment) / Final Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; punitive damages of $10,000 awarded in addition to existing awards; costs to plaintiff throughout; two justices dissenting
Legal Topics
Inducing Breach of Contract, Conspiracy to Take Over Business, Quantum of Damages, Punitive Damages
Source Language
english
Torts Contract Conspiracy Damages Inducing Breach of Contract Conspiracy to Take Over Business Quantum of Damages Punitive Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

H.L. Weiss Forwarding Limited

Plaintiff/appellant

Peter Omnus

Defendant/respondent

Hermann Ludwig Allgemeine Land-Und Seetransportgesellschaft

Defendant/respondent

Jurgen Eisen

Defendant/respondent

Hermann Ludwig (Canada) Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal Tort and Contract (conspiracy and Inducing Breach of Employment) / Final Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the award of $20,000 for conspiracy was sufficient
  2. 2 Whether punitive damages should be awarded in addition to compensatory damages for knowingly inducing breach of employment contracts coupled with a scheme to destroy the plaintiff's business
  3. 3 Liability for inducing employees to break contracts and for conspiracy to appropriate business and goodwill

Ratio Decidendi

Majority allowed the appeal in part and awarded an additional $10,000 in punitive damages because the defendants knowingly induced breaches of employment, implemented a pre-existing plan to appropriate the plaintiff's business and goodwill, and successfully put the plaintiff out of business, conduct warranting punishment beyond the compensatory $20,000 award.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; punitive damages of $10,000 awarded in addition to existing awards; costs to plaintiff throughout; two justices dissenting

Orders

  • Additional punitive damages of $10,000 awarded to the plaintiff against the defendants
  • Original compensatory awards upheld (approximately $20,000 for conspiracy plus prior awards for breach of contract)