Commerce & Industry Insurance Co. et al. v. West End Investment Co.
The Court held Jeando Inc. had an insurable interest by virtue of its contractual obligation to insure the leased premises; statutory condition 10(a) requires only the existence of an insurable interest (not an explicit statement of the nature of that interest on the policy) and the term 'owned'/'possédée' is to be interpreted broadly to include tenant possession for insurance purposes; absent insurer prejudice or binding agency, omission to specify the nature of the interest did not void the policies, so the insurers were liable for the $50,000 indemnity.
- Citation
- [1977] 2 SCR 1036
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Commerce & Industry Insurance Co. et al.; Respondent/plaintiff: West End Investment Company
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (insurance) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Insurable Interest, Statutory Condition 10(a), Interpretation of Civil Code Art.2571, Agency and Broker Knowledge, Policy Form Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commerce & Industry Insurance Co. et al.
Appellant/defendant
West End Investment Company
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (insurance) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a lessee who contracted to insure the leased building has an insurable interest
- 2 Whether failure to specify the nature of the insured’s interest in the policy voids the contract under Civil Code art.2571 and statutory condition 10(a) of the Insurance Act
- 3 What is the meaning of 'owned'/'possédée' in statutory condition 10(a)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held Jeando Inc. had an insurable interest by virtue of its contractual obligation to insure the leased premises; statutory condition 10(a) requires only the existence of an insurable interest (not an explicit statement of the nature of that interest on the policy) and the term 'owned'/'possédée' is to be interpreted broadly to include tenant possession for insurance purposes; absent insurer prejudice or binding agency, omission to specify the nature of the interest did not void the policies, so the insurers were liable for the $50,000 indemnity.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal for Quebec affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment