Metropolitan Trust v. Morenish Land Developments Ltd.
The mortgage's express language prescribed a nominal annual rate unqualified by any requirement to reinvest interim interest; therefore the court must give effect to the parties' language and the mortgagee was entitled to compute interest at 13% per annum by reference to monthly payment dates (per diem between dates) as performed, and the reinvestment principle does not apply absent contractual text to that effect.
- Citation
- [1981] 1 SCR 171
- Parties
- Appellant Plaintiff: Metropolitan Trust Company; Appellant Plaintiff: Canada Grundstuecksentwicklungen Lehndorff Vermoegensverwaltung G.m.b.H. & Co.; Appellant Plaintiff: W.B. Sullivan Construction Limited; Appellant Plaintiff: R.J. Prusac; Respondent Defendant: Morenish Land Developments Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Mortgage Interest Computation Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Ontario; Final Judgment by Supreme Court of Canada
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Court of Appeal order set aside; mortgagee entitled to recover the contested sum and costs
- Legal Topics
- Interest Calculation, Reinvestment Principle, Nominal Rate Vs Effective Rate, Prepayment of Principal, Interpretation of Payment Clauses
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Metropolitan Trust Company
Appellant Plaintiff
Canada Grundstuecksentwicklungen Lehndorff Vermoegensverwaltung G.m.b.H. & Co.
Appellant Plaintiff
W.B. Sullivan Construction Limited
Appellant Plaintiff
R.J. Prusac
Appellant Plaintiff
Morenish Land Developments Limited
Respondent Defendant
Procedural Posture
Mortgage Interest Computation Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Ontario; Final Judgment by Supreme Court of Canada
Legal Issues
- 1 How to calculate interest under a mortgage that states a per annum rate and provides interest payable monthly without specifying computation interval or reinvestment
- 2 Whether the 'reinvestment' or 'deemed reinvestment' principle applies as a rule of construction absent express contractual language
- 3 Whether payments of interest monthly at a stated annual rate produce a higher effective yield requiring an implied adjustment to produce the stated annual rate
Ratio Decidendi
The mortgage's express language prescribed a nominal annual rate unqualified by any requirement to reinvest interim interest; therefore the court must give effect to the parties' language and the mortgagee was entitled to compute interest at 13% per annum by reference to monthly payment dates (per diem between dates) as performed, and the reinvestment principle does not apply absent contractual text to that effect.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Court of Appeal order set aside; mortgagee entitled to recover the contested sum and costs
Orders
- Order setting aside the Court of Appeal decision
- Mortgagee entitled to $168,195.04 plus interest thereon at 13% per annum from August 16, 1977, simple interest until paid
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment