Bruce et al. v. Fuller
The appeal was quashed for want of jurisdiction because the order appealed from was an interlocutory interim injunction preserving the status quo and did not finally determine any substantive right; therefore it was not a "final judgment" within the meaning of the Supreme Court Act and not appealable to this Court.
- Citation
- [1936] SCR 124
- Parties
- Appellant (defendant): Mary Bruce; Appellant (defendant): The Nova Scotia Trust Company (executrix and executor of the will of Alfred D. Bruce, deceased); Appellant (defendant): Shelburne Shipbuilders Ltd.; Respondent (plaintiff): Lewis O. Fuller (on behalf of himself and all other shareholders of Shelburne Shipbuilders Ltd. other than Mary Bruce and The Nova Scotia Trust Company)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 1936
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Dismissal by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Banco of an Appeal From an Order Granting an Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Appeal quashed for want of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunction, Jurisdiction, Final Judgment, Shareholder Voting Rights, Procedural Control Over Course of Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Bruce
Appellant (defendant)
The Nova Scotia Trust Company (executrix and executor of the will of Alfred D. Bruce, deceased)
Appellant (defendant)
Shelburne Shipbuilders Ltd.
Appellant (defendant)
Lewis O. Fuller (on behalf of himself and all other shareholders of Shelburne Shipbuilders Ltd. other than Mary Bruce and The Nova Scotia Trust Company)
Respondent (plaintiff)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Dismissal by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Banco of an Appeal From an Order Granting an Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court of Canada had jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the dismissal of an appeal from an order granting an interim injunction
- 2 Whether an order granting an interim injunction constitutes a "final judgment" within the meaning of the Supreme Court Act (R.S.C. 1927, c. 35)
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was quashed for want of jurisdiction because the order appealed from was an interlocutory interim injunction preserving the status quo and did not finally determine any substantive right; therefore it was not a "final judgment" within the meaning of the Supreme Court Act and not appealable to this Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal quashed for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- Appeal quashed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment