Bunt v. Assuras
The appeal is dismissed because the trial judge's factual findings that the bills were final, that the appellant knew or ought to have known this, and that there were no special circumstances were supported by evidence and therefore not reviewable on appeal.
- Citation
- C39824
- Parties
- Appellant/applicant: Michael Bunt; Respondent/solicitor: Angela Assuras; Respondent/solicitors Firm: Bennett Best Burn
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Solicitor's Act Appeal / Appeal From Superior Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Vs Final Bills, Special Circumstances, Taxation of Solicitor's Bill, Appellate Review of Findings of Fact
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Bunt
Appellant/applicant
Angela Assuras
Respondent/solicitor
Bennett Best Burn
Respondent/solicitors Firm
Procedural Posture
Solicitor's Act Appeal / Appeal From Superior Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bills were interim or final
- 2 Whether special circumstances existed to alter treatment of bills
- 3 Whether the appellate court should disturb the trial judge's factual findings
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the trial judge's factual findings that the bills were final, that the appellant knew or ought to have known this, and that there were no special circumstances were supported by evidence and therefore not reviewable on appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs awarded to respondent Angela Assuras in the amount of $3,000 inclusive of disbursements and G.S.T.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment