International Association of Machinists v. Air Canada
The application was dismissed for mootness because any determination of the Board's jurisdiction would be limited to the highly unusual facts of the case and would have little precedential value.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2008 FCA 93
- Parties
- Applicant: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS; Applicant: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, DISTRICT LODGE 140; Respondent: AIR CANADA; Respondent: ACTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; Respondent: AC CARGO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; Respondent: ACGHS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Hearing and Judgment; Dismissed for Mootness
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Industrial Relations Board, Mootness, Judicial Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS
Applicant
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, DISTRICT LODGE 140
Applicant
AIR CANADA
Respondent
ACTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Respondent
AC CARGO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Respondent
ACGHS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Hearing and Judgment; Dismissed for Mootness
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Canada Industrial Relations Board had jurisdiction in the matter
- 2 Whether the application for judicial review was moot and should be dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed for mootness because any determination of the Board's jurisdiction would be limited to the highly unusual facts of the case and would have little precedential value.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
International Association of Machinists v. Air Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-03-11 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 93 File numbers A-12-07, T-1016-07 Decision Content Date: 20080311 Docket: A-12-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 93 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS AND INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, DISTRICT LODGE 140 Applicants and AIR CANADA, ACTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AC CARGO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND ACGHS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Respondents Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2008. Judgment delivered from the bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. Date: 20080311 Docket: A-12-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 93 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS AND INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, DISTRICT LODGE 140 Applicants and AIR CANADA, ACTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AC CARGO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND ACGHS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2008) LÉTOURNEAU J.A. [1] We are of the view that this application for judicial review should be dismissed for mootness. We are aware of the parties’ keen interest in the question of the jurisdiction of the Canada Industrial Relations Board in this matter, but any decision we would render on that point would have little precedential value because the decision would necessarily be limited to the facts of the case, which are highly unusual. [2] The application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs. “Gilles Létourneau” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-12-07 (AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION RENDERED BY THE CANADIAN NDUSTRIAL RELATIONS BOARD, DATED MAY 18, 2007, FROM FEDERAL COURT FILE NO. T-1016-07.) STYLE OF CAUSE: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS AND INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, DISTRICT LODGE 140 v. AIR CANADA, ACTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AC CARGO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND ACGHS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MARCH 11, 2008 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (LÉTOURNEAU, NADON & SHARLOW JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. APPEARANCES: Ian Roland FOR THE APPLICANTS Fred Headon Rachelle Henderson FOR THE RESPONDENTS SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANTS Air Canada Law Branch Dorval, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENTS