Société Immobilière Maisonneuve v. Chevaliers de Maisonneuve
The appeal is dismissed: the Court of Appeal correctly held that the aggressive intervention by the Chevaliers de Maisonneuve was maintainable and on the merits the intervenors were entitled to have their offers declared valid and to obtain conveyance; the Supreme Court declined to overturn the appellate court on the procedural point and affirmed that the intervenors satisfied the conditions and acquired the right to title, ordering conveyance (or judgment to have effect of deed) if not executed by the appellant by the specified date.
- Citation
- [1952] 2 SCR 456
- Parties
- Appellant (plaintiff): Société Immobilière Maisonneuve Limitée; Respondent (intervenor): Les Chevaliers de Maisonneuve
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 October 1952
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec; Appeal Limited to Whether Intervention Falls With Dismissal of Main Action and to Merits of Aggressive Intervention
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Court of King's Bench (Court of Appeal) confirming maintenance of intervention and ordering relief for intervenors affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Intervention (aggressive Vs Conservatory), Nullity Ab Initio, Capacity to Contract/incorporation, Title to Property/conveyance, Estoppel, Practice and Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Société Immobilière Maisonneuve Limitée
Appellant (plaintiff)
Les Chevaliers de Maisonneuve
Respondent (intervenor)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec; Appeal Limited to Whether Intervention Falls With Dismissal of Main Action and to Merits of Aggressive Intervention
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an aggressive intervention falls ipso facto when the main action is dismissed
- 2 Whether the intervenor may have its substantive claim to title adjudicated despite dismissal of the principal action
- 3 Whether the lease/contract was void ab initio for lack of capacity due to non‑incorporation of the Council
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed: the Court of Appeal correctly held that the aggressive intervention by the Chevaliers de Maisonneuve was maintainable and on the merits the intervenors were entitled to have their offers declared valid and to obtain conveyance; the Supreme Court declined to overturn the appellate court on the procedural point and affirmed that the intervenors satisfied the conditions and acquired the right to title, ordering conveyance (or judgment to have effect of deed) if not executed by the appellant by the specified date.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Court of King's Bench (Court of Appeal) confirming maintenance of intervention and ordering relief for intervenors affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Intervention of Les Chevaliers de Maisonneuve maintained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment