Bremsak v. Canada (Professional Institute of the Public Service)

Bremsak v. Canada (Professional Institute of the Public Service)

The application judge improperly exercised inherent jurisdiction by failing to consider the prejudice to the alleged contemnor; accordingly the stay was set aside and the matter remitted to the application judge for decision on the basis of the record before him.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 FCA 258
Parties
Appellant: Irene Bremsak; Respondent: The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada et al.
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 September 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal From Application Judge's Decision (2011 FC 406)
Outcome
Appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Inherent Jurisdiction, Prejudice to Alleged Contemnor, Remittal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Judicial Review Appeal Stay of Proceedings Inherent Jurisdiction Prejudice to Alleged Contemnor Remittal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Irene Bremsak

Appellant

The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada et al.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal From Application Judge's Decision (2011 FC 406)

  1. 1 Whether the application judge properly exercised inherent jurisdiction to impose a stay
  2. 2 Whether the application judge considered the prejudice to the alleged contemnor when imposing the stay
  3. 3 Whether the matter should be remitted to the application judge for decision on the existing record

Ratio Decidendi

The application judge improperly exercised inherent jurisdiction by failing to consider the prejudice to the alleged contemnor; accordingly the stay was set aside and the matter remitted to the application judge for decision on the basis of the record before him.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed.

Orders

  • Stay imposed by the application judge set aside.
  • Matter returned to the application judge for decision on the basis of the record before him.